Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone
(Ameenur Rasheed, London. m: +4479398447723. e: ameenyr1@yahoo.co.uk.
9 Muharram 1441 AH, 8 September 2019 CE)
The law itself is prejudicial and antithesis to well-being, integrity, morality and good composition of the family life. The making of law is driven by a sense of ultra-feminism.
This has destroyed the natural progression of a family where man is the leader and primary guardian.
A vile and wrongheaded lobby group from among the society has been able to incorporate their chaotic ideas into the body of law.
I am giving you some excerpts from a piece of legislation known as ‘Children Act 1989’ which clearly targets the man to be dis-empowered in the bearing of the family.
Particularly focus on section 2(2) and 2(4)
It means that
Section 2(2) means that father is not natural guardian whereas mother is. It also says that father needs to acquire it whereas mother does not.
Section 2(4) abolished the father’s natural guardianship that has been running since the inception of human civilisation.
So, the law is clearly sexually biased, discriminatory and instigator of family conflicts.
Children Act 1989 (1989 chapter 41)
2. Parental Responsibility for Children
(2) Where a child’s father and mother were not married to each other at the time of his birth-
(a) the mother shall have parental responsibility for the child;
(b) the father shall have parental responsibility for the child if he has acquired it (and has not ceased to have it)] in accordance with the provisions of this Act.
(4) The rule of law that a father is the natural guardian of his legitimate child is abolished.
https://www.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=1539803582827308&id=235319063275773